Navratra : changing meaning of Durga Saptsati - anti Nuclear warheads of black matter for threats from Pakistan!

Navratra has always been the time of homecoming, prayers, fasting and binging for me.

I don’t have a very transactional relationship with God! I don’t think that a benevolent God would fulfil my wish if I gift him/her a litre of oil or a saree.

However, picking up from my parents - I did get into the habit of semi-fasting during Navratra and reciting verses from the Durga Saptsati.

Every year, the meaning of the verses change for me. I vividly remember that when I was in class 3, and I was praying using some verses - my agenda was simple. I wanted the Goddess to be happy and give my parents the ‘sad-budhi’ to buy me a sunridges (SS) cricket bat! And it then happened magically. 

I think gifts reinforce the belief in God. Be it the gifts in Diwali, Idi of Eid or Santa’s gift during Christmas - a young and impressionable mind that operates on a very primitive reward-belief system: gets its faith system reinforced by these gifts (from God!).

In medical school, the most dreaded times of my academic life - where mugging was a pre-requisite of success, the verse - ‘ya devi sarvabhutesu vidya rupen sansthita’ had a deep significance.

Since the time marriage was on cards ‘patni manoramam dehi manovrittanusarinim’ has attained huge significance!

This year is the season of surgical strikes by India on its soil captured by enemy.

And while chanting the verse from Durga Saptsati where the acts of war between Goddess Durga and Sumbh-Nisumbh are illustrated with immaculate detail - the particular mention of neutralisation of warheads stood out!

I wonder if the divya-astra (are they nuclear war heads?) possessed by devtas, gods and asuras could be neutralised by counter-weapons-what would their analogy be in today’s world?

Today, if Pakistan threatens to annihilate the oldest civilisation of this planet and tomorrow if the real controllers of Pakistan’s nuclear assets really decide to unleash the power of nucelar integration or disintegration on us - how should we tackle them ?

I wondered today if we could tame black-matter that could become a wonderful antidote to nuclear warheads. What if Pakistan or China decides to nuke us - we could use black-matter shield to neutralise those warheads in the atmosphere itself - without the nuclear fallout. A black-matter bomb would definitely be a much worse threat in the hands of the irrational! But, we must keep inventing against annihilation. 

The verses of the Durga Saptsati continue to unfold new meanings for me every year.

Innovator's dilemma: Being or Doing

One of my jobs is to teach innovators and work with them on medical and social innovations. In course of doing that I not only work with my students and colleagues but also with scores of tech innovators.

Here is a dilemma I come across very often. 

When an innovator has conjured an idea for solving an unmet need - they want themselves and the idea to succeed. While there is no harm in that - and it is indeed desirable - I think a real problem arises when the innovator gets confused between the ‘mirage’ of success and the ‘real’ success.

I will keep my examples narrowly focused in the sector of ‘medical technology’ and ‘social innovations’ - the two sectors I work in.

Suppose a team has decided to solve the problem of ‘availability of safe drinking water’ - which is both a social and a medical problem.

Often a team would start with a clever technology which would most likely be a patent (a patent is NOT a product!) or a yet to be scaled & tested technology in some lab! And in most likelihood it would be half a decade before the team would know if they would even be able to assemble the first prototype that works.

But, ideas are cool! And the innovators are cooler!

They would like to be celebrated, give talks on how they hope to (often misunderstood by the rest of world as if they have already) cracked the problem.

This creates three problems:

a) The focus shifts from the rigour of execution to the coolness of the idea!

b) The (often small) teams behind the (yet to be proven) innovation get their shot of adrenaline from writing about their innovations, winning awards, getting press and being celebrated!

c) The attention is often NOT equal for team members - the one who has a position of power (say a seasoned academic who is a Principal Investigator - a scientific term for a Project Manager or Administrator) or someone with excellent oratory skills (who maybe not the one who has contributed much to the idea itself) or maybe even one who networks the most - steals the show! 

Let us analyse the outcomes of these problems:

a) Shift of Focus: Generating and running around with ideas is cool - execution often is NOT! Everyone wants the nicely painted walls of the futuristic office and nobody wants to manage inventory, deal with people, or generate leads - that is often not exciting enough!

b) False sense of success: Speaking at conferences, giving media bytes and attending networking events often gives a sense of moving ahead in life. You feel you are ’somebody’! But as long as your product or service (the real innovation) has not solved the problem it intended to solve - technically you have become the ‘innovation’. Your product/business/service has failed if it did not even solve a minor portion of the problem it aimed to solve.

c) Steal the show - Yes! That often creates a rift as the one who has been putting one’s head down and executing the technology/idea/business feels cheated. That often kills the camaraderie among the team - the X factor that helps a startup punch above its weight.

Meanwhile, the media (whose real business is to sell advertisements by capturing eye-balls with something of interest!) feeds on the innovators/startups. Not that media attention is a bad thing - it surely helps one get traction, raise funding and find evangelists. Unfortunately, in order to make a story even more attractive it misquotes, misleads and misconstructs information. 

Haven’t you heard that there is a pill already for the ill that you have and is going to come soon?

Worse still, we have been hearing that it has been coming soon for almost a decade?!

This is a sticky territory. The feelings of joy and attention (being!) that humans crave for are much easier to obtain than putting one’s head down and working to solve the problem one started to solve. And once you start getting the taste of ‘being’, the real fuel of achieving what you set out to achieve - the doing part - becomes much more tiring and often appears much more unattractive.

In my opinion some of the greatest successes have been built on doing and not being. 

And in this day and age when just registering a company with limited capital (that is technically a startup) - can give you a high by earning a label of a startup guy (or girl). 

Innovators face the dilemma : Being or Doing!

Rich or Poor - RIPE - economics of minimalism !

RIPE: the Economics of Minimalism

Around six years ago, I was discussing with my father the concept of money-management.
While I tried to impress him with my newly acquired knowledge of terms of finance and I was trying to explain some jargon, he kept listening patiently.

After another 20 mins of my blabber on financial planning and wisdom, it was my father’s turn to speak.
He asked me: Why worry so much about quaint terminology?

I mumbled some answer. But then he continued: Isn’t this all for becoming richer? Having a better life ?
I said: Of course! That is why there are financial advisors and CAs who help people plan!

My father agreed. He said, definitely that is correct, but at the core of all this notion is a very simple thing.
Just 4 variables, R,I,P & E. If you understand them - you will understand money, its role and its management.

Curious to understand the philosophy of RIPE I was all ears.
He continued: R=Rich; I = Income; P = Poor; E = Expenditure.

And irrespective of the absolute values of these variables, this is the simplified relationship between these variables:

R is when I > E and P is when E > I.

I resisted! And my father continued: 
He said, “No matter how much you earn, if your expenditure is more than your income, you will remain poor. And a poor man is often worried, needs to work hard, is full of complain and grudges and can not enjoy one’s life! On the other hand, if your expenditure is less than your income, you have a surplus. You can relax, enjoy your life, and derive pleasure out of smallest of things.”

He concluded: “Not that one should force poverty on oneself, but a fine balance between Income (I) and Expenditure (E) shall decide one’s state of bring Rich (R) or Poor (P). And often it is one’s choice”.

That wisdom, although an oversimplification has been a guiding principle in my journey towards minimalism and keeping E < I has given me immense joy and a lot of spare time to pursue dreams.

Dear Father, on Teacher's day, thank you for this life changing lesson!